The Science of Monsters: Tracking the Real-Life Creatures (The Science Of...) By Joe Nickell
The science of monsterss summary
Was not a case of mistaken identity but fraud to get the chance to meet the author in a quite clever way At the same time the author s entries are all seemingly articles that can be found online if you don t want to read them And if you choose to do so each entry gives you some information followed by a brief page of note s and references for that particular entry to match with all the cited sources in the actual text thus allowing you to fact check if you will A few things that stood out to me as a reader is you can read the sections any way you want instead of how they are presented in the book for they don t heavily lean on one another to move onto the next section Just be aware that no matter which section you choose to read there are basically spoilers in each so some of the cases you may not have read yet and if they are included will give you the answer before you are ready for it Another part of the book that stood out was the inclusion of an excerpt by Kathy Ramsland about Mercy Lena Brown Given this is from another author and doesn t count against Joe Nickell.
The science of monsterswood
Will be for the man apes since two thirds of it is basically repeated from other entries within with a bit nuggets for those interested in the topic Meanwhile the reader is provided with black and white photographs mixed with his own illustrative interpretations occasionally throughout the book with captions at the bottom of each I am not sure whether it was the editor who made the coloring scale or the author but some of these photos are horrendous There is suppose to be one of a Viking death of a raccoon that is basically a blurry mess that doesn t clearly provide the reader with the captioned easy view of a raccoon unless you actually go online to find the photo.
The science of monstersnap
This book suffers the same problems as Nickell s other works very poor editing repetition and the feeling that there is an excellent book struggling to escape the format You really do get the impression that it is a series of blog posts all individually fascinating but which read one after the other becomes very samey It opens with water monsters Kraken Nessie etc and whilst Nickell is undoubtedly correct in his identification of otters as the cause reading this in every single entry complete with further notes weakens the reading experience as you could copy and paste much of each entry It is the same when it comes to hairy bipeds only here it is misidentification of bears that is the culprit Again definitely correct it s a convincing argument but going into this using the same facts and notes in each entry does get tedious. The monster study of 1939 The strong point of this book is that it is overwhelmingly likely that Nickell is correct in all cases This makes it an invaluable work of reference and an antidote to rubbish paranormal books However it could be a much interesting work The Science of Monsters Tracking the Real Life Creatures The Science Of I dreamed for years for a new Nickell book and had almost given up on seeing another one published With a new book I had hoped that the repetition bad editing though I am being generous in providing this author a two stars instead of kicking his book down is that it does give readers a sight into being open minded to the field of cryptozoology even if most of the time we can explain these cryptids away He does a fairly good job in explaining that most cryptids fall into two categories unknowns or those who were known but thought to be extinct explains how we can tackle solving these mysteries with some research as well as in some cases time and also in providing details of the modern animals But that is about as far as my vouching for him goes The book starts off with a question about who the author is and provides to the reader willing to walk down that path glowing reviews from other famous people or entities And when they aren t honking his horn Joe Nickell does a great job himself throughout his writings even to the point of making mention that he did something or had a great honor bestowed on him that isn t even relatable to what you are reading This can be vouched I am almost certain by the one major case for the chupacabra that he chose to include which I promise according to Occam s theory I would say I think he could have used a much clearer source The excerpt states that Lena s mother and her oldest sister died but then after a vague comment on her brother returning but from who knows where the daughters along with their mother was dug up might be a bit confusing if you don t know the story My only warning for these sections though which is a true shame when you take into account the brightly colored floatie it was on And although he may be a factual and science based investigator there were a few spots that left me baffled He mentions Ancient Greek siren victims as starving to death although that would have been a much rarer occurrence than drowning according to the original origins of that Bigfoots are analogous to zombies who capture peoples souls what zombie is known for soul capture and that criminals sold to Venetians for galley slaves were chained to the rudder galley slaves were to my knowledge on benches with oars which I can find nothing to vouch for that even going with the referenced Wikipedia source he had I did spend a while trying to tackle other sources to see if that was the case but nothing can seem to educate me on this fact And although it doesn t discount him it does also show that he just like the rest of humans may not always be as factually updated as is given Finally Joe Nickell also does weirdly enough provide the reader with a popular reference to Twilight instead of Dracula for his vampire section which tells me he is trying to groom a much younger audience So in conclusion if you can overlook the egoism the cardboard answers whether they be real or not the horrible coloring of pictures the repetitiveness of a few of the entries and the tediumness of the Bigfoot section then you may find this a book with some interesting takes on the world around us a new insight into the field of cryptozoology and a better idea on how to fact check other encounters you may come across The Science of Monsters Tracking the Real Life Creatures The Science Of
The Science of Monsters: Tracking the Real-Life Creatures (The Science Of...) By Joe Nickell |
English |
265 |
Kindle Edition |
book the science of monsters pdf |
book the science of monsters book |
book the science of monsters and monsters |
book the science of monsters summary |
monster book of monsters pdf |
the science of monsters book review |
the science of monsters book pdf |
the science of monsters book summary |
the science of monsters book series |
the science of monsters book 2 |
pdf the science of monsters inc |
pdf the science of monsters pdf |
pdf the science of monsters and monsters |
pdf the science of monsters book |
pdf the science of monsters inc book |

The science of monsterspine
And other problems would be fixed but no He still recycles information and cases from his older books and from his Skeptical Inquiry articles that goes back decades. The science of monsters book summary Utilizing his varied background Nickell has become widely known as an investigator of myths and mysteries frauds forgeries and hoaxes He has been c Joe Nickell Ph