The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics (Studies in Postwar American Political Development) By E.J. Fagan
The thinker quotes
The American system is contrasted to many other countries which have explicit party think tanks that serve the party Here the think tanks that work on a range of issues have both spare capacity to devote to the topic of the day rather than narrower think tanks as well as can help parties prioritize and set the agenda One of the books audacious claims is that partisan think tanks have played a meaningful role in polarization by supplying each side with different facts and interpretations That the difference between the parties is less normative than the way they read the positive analysis and data. The tinkersons comic today There was some intriguing data that coded the distribution of policy papers by think tanks showing that they are skewed towards partisan topics when measured against the CRS For example.
Book the things our fathers saw
And testimony are polarized although it is unclear what is cause and what is effect. Book the things we do for love The book differentiates between the think tanks Left ones are inclined to cite university research and accept interpret repackage CBO numbers Right ones are less inclined to cite university research and do of their own modeling In his case studies Fagan finds that both Heritage and CAP produce biased estimates of policy but CBPP does not He is particularly scathing on the role that money has played in shifting conservatives on the topic of climate change. Book the things we leave unfinished One of the weaknesses of the book was that it implicitly assumed that think tanks were the exogenous.
EPub The thinkers synonym
The Thinkers The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics Studies in Postwar American Political Development I ve spent a lot of time working for think tanks working with think tanks and consuming the output of think tanks both while in government and outside it And I still learned an enormous amount from this book The overall story is familiar to people who have paid a lot of attention as government grew the demand for expertise grew for a while this was satisfied by ostensibly neutral and non partisan sources like universities RAND Brookings the Congressional Budget Office CBO the Congressional Research Service CRS etc But then the conservative movement decided these were all actually liberal sources so it set up the Heritage Foundation as a counterweight the first think tank that was explicitly partisan as well as emphasized communications and relations on Capital Hill This was the creation of an alternative conservative knowledge regime Then progressives set up the Center for American Progress as a counterweight to Heritage in part mirrored on its rapid response easily digestible information and relations with Congress and the media The book also intensively studies two other think tanks it considers partisan the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities CBPP and the American Enterprise Institute AEI It considers a range of others as well. The thinker poem What makes the book novel is how much original data and analytics it brings to bear on a range of questions as well as a little bit political and international context For example think tanks do little on public lands agriculture transportation and science relative to CRS but they do a lot on health civil rights and macroeconomics The book also shows empirical evidence that issues partisan think tanks devote attention to as measured by white papers citations by members of Congress independent variable causing lots of stuff as opposed to taking seriously the ways in which they were reflecting and internalizing changes in the political system How much were they driving politicians or supplying what they wanted The book does provide some time series evidence on this issue but for a variety of reasons I was not completely convinced Perhaps a bigger one is that it probably does too much to accept the neutrality of universities Brookings and the non partisan knowledge regime While Heritage dramatically overstated their case against all of this they were not completely wrong Which also means that CAP citing academic research than Heritage does is partly a reflection of CAP being scientific but also partly because scientists are liberal. The thinkery hours I also would love to read Fagan s thoughts and analysis on what has happened recently In effect the book is about the period the data covers from the 1970s through about five years ago But since then the Roosevelt Institute has for example played a big role in staffing the Biden administration on economic policy Other groups like Groundwork Collaborative are challenging the approach of traditional progressive think tanks These are barely if at all mentioned in the book which does give a little attention to the alternative right of center think tanks like Niskanen But hopefully this is not Fagan s last word on this topic 0197759661
| The Thinkers: The Rise of Partisan Think Tanks and the Polarization of American Politics (Studies in Postwar American Political Development) By E.J. Fagan |
| 0197759661 |
| 9780197759660 |
| English |
| 216 |
| Paperback |
| book the things we leave unfinished |
| book the things they carried |
| book the thinking body |
| book the things they carried by tim o'brien |
| book the things we do for love |
| book the things our fathers saw |
| book the things we cannot say by kelly rimmer |
| book the thicket |
| iron publishers mc book 6 thinkers witch |
| the thinker bookends |
| the tinkers book |
| the thinker bookends bronze |
| the thinker bookends 1928 |
| we thinkers books |
| oxford thinkers bookshelf |
.. Great thinkers book Other intriguing data documented the decline of witnesses at Congressional hearings from universities and non partisan sources and the increase in witnesses from partisan think tanks